Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (2) TMI 703

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... basis of that information police intercepted a car coming through Madurai Ring Road, Madurai, Chennai at 11.00 p.m. The car was driven by A-3 and the first appellant was found travelling in the car and a search was made and ganja weighing 5 kg. and a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs cash were recovered from the car. The first appellant was arrested at 11.15 p.m. on 10.7.2003 and on the basis of a confessional statement made by her search was conducted in building No. 4/1078-A of Bharat Street, Anbu Nagar, Madurai at about 1.15 a.m. on 11.7.2003. The second appellant was found staying in that house and she was also taken into custody at 1.15 a.m. Both appellants were taken to the house at Chennai bearing No. 486-C and found in that house it is alleged t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aken to safeguard their lives. This telegram is said to have been sent from Chennai. When the bail application was considered by a learned Single Judge of the High Court, pursuant to request made by the Court, Kandasamy, who is alleged to have sent telegram from Chennai filed an affidavit along with affidavits of two lawyers. In the affidavit it was alleged that they got information about the illegal detention of the appellants and they came to Chennai and as per the instruction given by the Advocates, the telegram was sent in the name of Kandasmay. 6. The fact that such a telegram was sent and received is not disputed. However, it is stated by the respondent that they could not find whereabouts of Kandasamy. It is also pertinent to note....