Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (5) TMI 103

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to 30.06.2009 under Notification No. 41/2007-ST dt. 06.10.2007. The Adjudicating Authority sanctioned the refund claim of Rs. 1,51,087/-. The remaining refund claim of Rs. 1,19,016/- was rejected on two grounds, namely, that it pertains to refund of Service Tax in relation to Terminal Handling Charges used for export of said goods and that Service Tax was yet to be paid on commission payable to foreign agents. 3. The refund claim on Terminal Handling Charges was rejected on the ground that prior to 07.07.2009, the Notification No. 41/2007 did not specify the Terminal Handling Charges. Hence, the refund claim of Rs. 42,550/- on Terminal Handling Charges was held as not admissible. The balance amount of Rs. 76,466/- was rejected on the groun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ction of GAR-7s challans along with invoice wise details. 5. The Ld. AR reiterated the findings in the order of Ld. Commissioner (Appeals). He contended that in view of the mandatory condition 2(f)(ii) of Notification No. 41/2007-ST, the refund had rightly been rejected. 6. Heard the parties and examined the records. 7. Issue No. 1. I find that the issue of refund of Terminal Handling Charges prior to the amendment dt. 07.07.2009 in the Notification No. 41/2007-ST, has been decided by this Tribunal in the case of Narhar Fibres Vs. C.C.E. Chandigarh-I (supra) wherein this Tribunal has held as under. "6. I find that the issue of whether the Terminal Handling Charges would fall under port services prior to 07.07.2009 has been decided by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d Section 66A of the Act. 7. Subsequently, by Notification No. 17/2009-S.T., dated 7-7-2009 the Government issued further exemptions, exempting taxable services enumerated in the table, received by an exporter of goods and used for export of goods from the whole of the Service Tax leviable thereon; and subject to specified conditions. Sl. No. 16 of the table in this Notification enumerates a broad category exemption for any service classified in Section 65(105) when the payment of Service Tax is for a service mainly known as terminal handling charges. 8. By reference to the exemption provided at Sl. No. 16 of the table in Notification No. 17/2009-S.T., the adjudicating authority inferred; and in the considered view of this Tribunal erro....