2017 (5) TMI 22

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ember (Technical) Mr. Suryanarayan, Advocate with Ms Garima Bajaj, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Ashok Mehta, PCS for respondents. Order The appellants have challenged the order dated 2^nd January, 2017 passed by National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as the "Tribunal" for short) in T.P. No.27/397-398/NCLT/AHM/2016 (New), CP No.49/397-398/....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rder it is clear that the appellants who were contesting respondents before the Tribunal raised the question of maintainability of petition under Section 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 on the ground that the respondents/petitioners are not the shareholders and, thereby, do not have the locus standi to file the petition. The said stand was taken by the appellants on the ground that one MOU ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....M/s Bhaskar Silk Mills Pvt Ltd and Prabhakar Processors Pvt Ltd are two different corporate entities. Unless and until in pursuance of the MOU, shareholders in both the companies transfer their shares following the procedure laid down under the Act and Articles of Association, it cannot be said that Petitioners or for that matter any other shareholder who is not a signatory to MOU ceased to be a s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... definition given in any Enactment can be applied to the provisions in the Act or by analogy to other Acts but not to agreements between parties in violation of the Indian Contract Act. It is obvious that the definition of "relative" in Section 2(41) of Companies Act 1956 is applicable to Section 299 of Companies Act, 1956." From the aforesaid findings it will be clear that to decide the que....