2016 (11) TMI 1393
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ichandran (Technical Member) The appeal is against order dated 17.07.2007 of Commissioner (Appeals) Jaipur. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of A.C. SR conductors liable to Central Excise duty. The dispute in the present case is that the quantum of abatement available on sales tax on the impugned order in terms of Section 4(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The differential duty de....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... paid to the State Government. The show cause notice proceeded to demand duty of Central Excise on the sales tax retained by the appellant considering the same as part of the assessable value. During the course of the argument, ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted copies of VAT returns filed by the appellant during the impugned period. We note that under Sl. No. E regarding total tax liability,....