2017 (4) TMI 1034
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... : Mr.S.P.Chidambaram For Respondents : Mr.M.Swaminathan ORDER These writ petitions are filed challenging the order dated 27.01.2017 passed by the first respondent giving effect to the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 24.08.2016 for the assessment years 2010-2011 & 2011-2012. 2. The petitioner was originally issued with orders of assessment and challenging such orders, ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... High Court in the case of M/s.Knorr Bremsc India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT to the petitioner's case and therefore the giving effect order issued by the first respondent is not in accordance with the directions issued by the Tribunal. Therefore, the learned counsel sought interference of this Court, by exercising the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. No doubt, the learned ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pondent, impugned in these writ petitions can be challenged before the next fact finding authority, namely the First Appellate Authority. No doubt the learned counsel for the petitioner sought to contend that the first respondent has not given effect to the orders passed by the Tribunal, by applying the decision of the Delhi High Court in M/s.Knorr Bremsc India Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT case. But a peru....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....as well. 8. Moreover, it is well settled that in cases involving fiscal nature, availing of statutory appellate remedy has to be first exhausted and the party cannot come directly to this court and file a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. At this juncture, it is useful to refer to the following decisions:- 1) M/s.Nivaram Pharma Private Limited, rep. By its Direct....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI