Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (8) TMI 1266

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ina, J. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 41 dated 20.3.2010 (Annexure P1) under Sections 420 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') registered at Police Station Khuian Sarwar, District Ferozepur and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. The prosecution case, in brief, is that at about 8.00 p.m.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....I am of the opinion that the instant petition deserves to be allowed. The vehicle of the petitioner was taken in possession by the Police as the driver of the vehicle in question had failed to produce the bills qua material loaded in the vehicle. Admittedly, the proceedings under Section 51(7)(c) of the Act were initiated against the petitioner. The Officer Incharge-cum-Excise and Taxation Office....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ab Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The goods are meant for trade and as an attempt of evasion of tax on the goods has been established, a penalty of ₹ 93,000/- is imposed u/s 51(7)(c) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act 2005 on the goods and Vat u/s 51(12) amounting to ₹ 11,491/- is also levied on the goods. The total demand comes to ₹ 1,04,491/-." In pursuance of the said order, petit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....39;ble Court in respect to the FIR no. 41 dated 20.3.2010 lodged with the Police station Khuian Sarwar District Ferozepur in respect to the goods and the vehicle in question." Thus, the petitioner was proceeded under the Act and a penalty of ₹ 93,000/- was imposed on him under Section 51(7)(c) of the Act and Vat under Section 51(12) of the Act amounting to ₹ 11491/- was also levied on....