2017 (4) TMI 641

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... ORDER Per: Dr. D.M. Misra Heard the learned Authorized Representative for the Revenue. None appeared for the Assessee-Respondent.  2.  This appeal is filed by Revenue against OIA No.108/2007(Ahd-I), dt.21.03.2007, passed by Commissioner (Appeals), C.Ex. & S.Tax, Ahmedabad. 3.  The Respondent was engaged in the manufacture of Iron and steel products and discharging ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ti Steel Rolling Mills Vs CCE - 2015 (326) ELT 209 (SC) had observed as under:- "44.  We have declared in this judgment that the interest and penalty provisions under the Rules 96ZO, ZP, and ZQ of the Central Excise Rules, 1994 are invalid for the reasons assigned in the judgment. Accordingly, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed and the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed....