Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2017 (3) TMI 1485

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ep Misra, AOR ORDER We have heard Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 at length today. As it appears from the facts that the Tanda Thermal Power Station was acquired by the appellant - herein under a Statutory Transfer Scheme notified by the Government of Uttar Pradesh in exercise of the powers vested under the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Reforms Act, 1999, the State Government issued the Uttar Pradesh Reforms (Transfer of Tanda Generating Undertaking) Scheme, 2000 and by virtue of the said Statutory Scheme, the Tanda Thermal Power Station was transferred and vested in the State Government and thereafter vested in the appellant - herein on the terms set out in Clause 3 of the Transfer Scheme. The sa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) reached between the appellant and Respondent No.2 - herein in regard to the consequences of the reduction of capital cost of Tanda Station determined by the Central Commission at Rs. 607.00 Crores as against the transfer price of Rs. 1000.00 Crores under the Notification dated 14-1-2000 and depreciation of an amount of Rs. 175.91 Crores charged upto the date of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or the appellant who had pointed out that what is relevant is the purchase consideration paid by the NTPC which is admittedly Rs. 607.00 Crores and not Rs. 431.09 Crores. The Appellate Tribunal, according to him, has wrongly distinguished the decision of this Hon'ble Court relied upon by the appellant before the said Tribunal which is reported in AIR 1959 SC 1232 (Jogta Coal Company vs. Commis....