Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (3) TMI 1194

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....R) for the respondent Order These two appeals are directed against Order-in-Original No. 05/MS-05/2008/Thane-I dated 27/03/2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane - I. 2. Heard both the sides and perused the records. 3. The issue involved in this case is regarding imposition of penalties by the adjudicating authority on the appellants under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the goods were never purchased or procured from an EOU and they were not at all aware that the goods were diverted from the EOU. It was also argued that the notice is vague inasmuch as it is not indicating specifically the value of the quantity procured by them and that the penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs imposed is excessive considering the fact that one of the co-noticee Shri M.D. Gala, who was a Char....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....inspection of the goods and the statements also records that both the appellants were indulged in purchase of fabrics in cash without any documents. If the appellant's case is that they were not aware that the goods were of non-duty paid and diverted then they had no explanation for purchase of fabrics on cash from individuals who sold to them. In my considered view, the appellants' claim of ignor....