Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (3) TMI 856

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tual sale takes place at the premises of the buyer. Therefore, no abatement on account of freight and insurance is permitted. Accordingly, a show-cause notice was issued for the period 01/04/2003 to 31/03/2004. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand. Being aggrieved by the order-in-original, the respondent filed appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals), who set aside the demand and allowed the appeal. Therefore, the revenue is before us. 2. Shri S.V. Nair, Learned Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the revenue reiterates the grounds of appeal. He submits that since the insurance policy was taken by the respondent, the ownership of goods remained with the respondent till the delivery at the customer s premises. Ther....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e includible in the assessable value or not. The appellant relies upon the Supreme Court judgement in the case of M/s.Escorts JCB Ltd.  2002 (146) ELT 31 (SC) to stress the point that freight inclusive insurance is not part of assessable value. Secondly, it is their argument that the goods are sold at the factory gate that being the place of removal, the prices are shown ex-factory in the orders accepted for execution by the appellant. The freight charges are separately shown on each of the invoice on actual basis. The insurance is taken by the appellant for the transit of the goods and for any damages the insurance claim is lodged by them. It is also explained by the appellant that in case the goods are damaged in transit it is up t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....confirmed the demand holding that Escort JCB was decided based on certain terms and conditions of sale and purchase in that very case and each case has to be examined in light of similar kind of terms and conditions. In the present case as per the lower authority, Escort JCB is not applicable in view of the fact that the terms and conditions of the sale in the instant case are different than those of M/s.Escort JCB. Further the lower authority holds that the order acceptance form clearly mentions transport by Ispat Industries Ltd. Further, the lower authority observed that order acceptance form of the assessee mentions additional condition such as inspection on site. I have perused the representative purchase orders, acceptance orders and....