2017 (3) TMI 853

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rma, AR - for the respondent ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order denying cenvat credit on the waste and scrap generated at the end of the  job worker. 2.  The facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of IC engines and sent some goods for processing to the job worker. The appellant availing cenvat credit on the inputs sent to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sioner allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, confirmed the demand of duty and imposing penalty on the appellant. Aggrieved from the said order, the appellant is before us. 3.  The Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that the waste and scrap generated at the end of the job worker is not dutiable. In fact, no process of manufacturing took place in respect of waste and scrap generated du....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sions. 6.  We find that the sole ground taken by the Ld. AR is that as job workers availing SSI Exemption and not clearing the scrap of payment of duty. In that circumstances, the appellant is not entitled to take cenvat credit on the inputs which contained waste and scrap generated at the end of the job workers. The similar issue came up before this Tribunal in the case of Mahindra Hinoda....