2017 (3) TMI 499

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... AR - for the respondent ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the cenvat credit on inputs were denied on the premise that the invoices against which the appellant has taken the credit were not pre-authenticated by the dealer and the dealer has not maintain records for goods supplied to the appellant. 2.  Heard the parties and considered the submissions. 3.&n....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se:- (i) Banswara Fabrics Ltd. V. Commr. Of C.E., Jaipur- 2002 (150) ELT 921 (Tri. Del.) (ii) Ramgarh Chini Mills v. Commr. Of C.E., Kanpur- 1998 (103) ELT 65 (Tribunal) (iii) Vikrant Tyres Ltd., V. Commr of C. Excise, Banglore- 2000 (119) ELT 185 (Tribunal) (iv) Rahul Steel Forging Pvt. Ltd. V. Commr. Of C.Ex., Bhopal- 202 (149) ELT 163 (Tri. Del.) (v) Commr. Of customs, Meerut v. Triveni En....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of such lapse.. Therefore, I hold that the cenvat credit cannot be denied to the appellant. 6.  With regard to the issue of non maintenance of record by the dealer as per Rule 9(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, I find that as per the said Rule, the dealer is required to maintain the record to pass proportionate cenvat credit on the goods received from the manufacture to the buyers on pr....