2011 (3) TMI 1715

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ve, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Akil Kureshi, J. (Oral)]. - The Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Tribunal dated 12-10-2007, by which the Tribunal was pleased to delete penalty of Rs. 3,00,000/- imposed on the assessee by the Commissioner, under Rule 96ZQ of the Central Excise Rules. 2. Initially, the Deputy Commissioner imposed penalty of Rs. 6,00,000/- und....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (5) of Rule 96ZQ, on the ground that the entire duty along with interest was paid by 31-7-1999, by the assessee. The Commissioner also, in his appellate order, recorded that the appellant did not deposit the amount of Rs. 6,00,000/- by due date i.e. 6-9-1999, but, instead deposited such amount on 31-7-2009. It, thus, becomes clear that instead of depositing the duty within the first half of the m....