2017 (2) TMI 299

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for the Respondent Order The appellant have filed refund claim under Rule 5 read with Notification No. 11/2002-CE(NT) dated 1-3-2002 for quarter January to March, 2004 in respect of accumulated Cenvat credit against the export of goods. The Commissioner(Appeals) denied the refund claim on the ground that appellant have not justified that why accumulated credit was not utilized for the domestics ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missioner of C. Ex. Thane-I[2007(217) ELT 299(Tri. Mum)] (d) Jenntex Engg. Company Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. Coimbatore[2009(234) ELT 519(Tri. Mum)] (e) Bishen Dyg. Ptg. & Wvg. Mills. Vs. Commissioner of C. E. Thane-I[2007(210) ELT 582(Tri. Mum)] 3. Shri. V.K. Shastri, Ld. Asstt. Commissioner(A.R.) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. 4. We have c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt is not possible, the manufacturer or the provider of output service shall be allowed refund of such amount subject to such safeguards, conditions and limitations, as may be specified, by the Central Government, by notification: Provided that no refund of credit shall be allowed if the manufacturer or provider of output service avails of drawback allowed under the Customs and Central Excise Dut....