2013 (1) TMI 898

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tian Department by : Shri Omprakash Meena O R D E R PER RAJENDRA SINGH, AM: These cross appeals are directed against the order dated 3.3.2010 of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2007-08. The only dispute raised in this appeal is regarding disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia) for deducting tax at lower rate. 2. The facts in brief are that the AO during the assessment procee....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ade in the month of June 2006 deducted tax at lower rate of .25%. The AO, therefore disallowed the sum of Rs. 21,05,580/-. In case of M/s. Devendra Roadways, the AO vide certificate under section 197 dated 21.11.2005, had allowed deduction at lower rate of .56%. The AO observed that the certificate was valid for financial year 2005-06. However, the assessee in respect of payment made of Rs. 21,20,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of amount deductible at Rs. 6,839/-. Similarly in case of M/s. Shivji Kanji, the assessee had deducted sum of Rs. 21,735/- where tax deductible was Rs. 13,730/-. Thus, in the above two cases the assessee had deducted more tax overall. CIT(A), therefore, deleted the disallowance made in respect of the above party. In case of M/s. Devendra Roadways, CIT(A) found that tax deductible was Rs. 47,491/- ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ower rate, no disallowance is to be made. Reliance for this proposition was placed on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of DCIT vs. Chandrabhoy & Jassobhoy in ITA No.20/Mum/10 for the assessment year 2006-07 order dated 8.7.2011 and on the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta dated 3.12.2012 in the case of CIT vs. S.K. Tekriwal in Income tax Appeal No.183 of 2012. The ld. DR o....