Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1971 (11) TMI 4

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....arani Bhar, widow of the deceased. 3. Sri Gouri Shankar Bhar } 4. Sri Uma Shankar Bhar } sons of the deceased. 5. Sri Durga Shankar Bhar. } 6. Smt. Sova Rani Bhar, daughter of the deceased. Smt. Radharani Bhar, Sri Uma Sankar Bhar, Sri Gouri Shankar Bhar and Sri Durga Shankar Bhar have equal shares in the properties left over by the assessee and each one of them was entitled to one-fourth share in the estate of the deceased. Admittedly, the family is governed by the Dayabhaga school of Hindu law. The deceased's son, Gouri Shankar Bhar, was granted letters of administration by the court in respect of the properties left over by the deceased. He filed the wealth-tax return in his capacity as the administrator of the estate of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t continues to belong to the Hindu undivided family as a whole. He further observed that although the unity of ownership of properties was not present in the case of Dayabhaga families, there was unity of possession in respect of the said properties. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner, therefore, held that unless and until there was a partition in the family, the property and the assets of the family belonged to the Hindu undivided family as a whole. A second appeal was taken to the Appellate Tribunal which reversed the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner and held, for the detailed reasons given in its order, that under the Dayabhaga school of Hindu law, each coparcener had a definite share in the properties left by the de....