TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (1) TMI 308
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....presentative (DR) - for the Respondent. Per. V. Padmanabhan :- The present appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal dated 21/02/2011 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Jaipur. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Ceramic sanitary- ware products classifiable under Chapter 69 of the Central Excise Tariff. The appellant entered into a contract with M/s Sacmi Cooperative Meccanisi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Finance Act, 1994. When this order was challenged before Commissioner (Appeals), he confirmed the order-in-original vide the impugned order. In the present appeal, the main grounds are as follows :- (i) the activities undertaken by the foreign supplier cannot be subjected to levy of service tax during the period 2005-2006 for the reason that the import of service became taxable only w.e.f. 18/04....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ing engineer service. Further, they have also objected to the charging of service tax under erection, commissioning or installation service with their argument that these activities were undertaken by the appellant with the help of the technical personnel provided by the foreign supplier. 2. We have heard Shri Manish Gaur, learned Advocate for the appellant as well as Shri Govind Dixit, learned D....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (supra) has categorically held that any contract in the nature of works contract cannot be vivisected into its various elements and charged to service tax separately for the period prior to 01/06/2007 when WCS was introduced in the statute. In the present case the import of the machinery alongwith the associated services was complete during the period 2005-2006, before the in....