Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1971 (7) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al by special leave arises from the decision of the High Court of Delhi wherein the High Court refused to call for a statement of case under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The material facts of the case are as follows : There was a sale of jewellery in 1937 to the Prince of Berar. The main question that fell for decision was whether the sale was by the firm known as M/s. B....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ewellery in question on the sole ground that the right to collect the price of those jewellery had been assigned to their share. The Income-tax Officer rejected the plea of Kapur Chand and Hira Lal and assessed them in respect of the profits said to have arisen as a result of the sale of those jewellery as an association of persons. That order was affirmed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner. ....