2017 (1) TMI 161

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r respondent Order The fact of the case is that the appellant has removed worn out parts of the capital goods from the factory without payment of duty. The show cause notice was issued by the department demanding duty by invoking the provisions of Rule 3(4) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand and Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the same, therefore the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ioner of C. Ex., Pune-III 2007 (219) E.L.T. 911 (Tri.-Mumbai) (ii) Commissioner of Central Excise, Pondicherry Vs. CESTAT, Chennai 2013 (297) E.L.T.498 (Mad.) (iii) Commissioner of C. Ex., Belapur Vs. Reforms Machine Tools Ltd. 2007 (220) E.L.T. 171 (Tri.-Mumbai) (iv) Commissioner of C. Ex., Aurangabad Vs. Sanjivani (Takli) SSK Ltd. 2009 (235) E.L.T. 753 (Tri.-Mumbai) (v) Garden Plast ....