Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 1520

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....horised Representative ORDER This appeal is filed against OIA No. OIA-KRS/435/VAPI/2009 dated 09.12.2009, passed by Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise & Service Tax, Vapi. 2.  Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant are engaged in the manufacture of Di-calcium Phosphate (Animal Feed Grade) falling under Chapter heading No. 2835.00 up to 22.07.1996 and thereafter unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al before the ld. Commissioner (Appeals), who in turn, rejected their appeal.  Hence, the present appeal. 3.  Ld. Advocate for the appellant submits that they have furnished the details of duty debited/ paid on the final product Di-calcium Phosphate by their letter dated 20.07.2006.  He submits that they had availed an amount Rs. 10,96,976/- as credit on inputs used in the manufact....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t amount towards discharge of duty on disputed product Di-calcium Phosphate which was later classified as an exempted product.  Both the lower authorities have denied the refund on the misconception that said credit was in relation to the raw materials/inputs used in the manufacture of Di-calcium Phosphate, hence not eligible for refund.  Whereas, in the letter dated 20.07.2006, the appe....