2016 (12) TMI 1060

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h, Adv., Mr. Alok Yadav, Adv., Mr. Rohit Jain, Adv., Mr. Somnath Shukla, Adv., Mr. Udit Jain, Adv., Mr. Dhruv Bhattacharya, Adv., Mr. K. Ajit Singh, Adv., Mr. Praveen Kumar, AOR, Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, Adv., Mr. V. Lakshmi Kumaran, Adv., Ms. L. Charanya, Adv., Mr. Aditya Bhattacharya, Adv., Mr. Victor Das, Adv., Mr. Anandh K., Adv. and Mr. M.P. Devanath, AOR for the Petitioners. Mr. K. Radhakri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... with effect from 11.5.2001 on the foundation that the Notification No.125/84-CE issued in exercise of power under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 has not been withdrawn and remained in force till 1.4.2003 when the notification was rescinded? (2) Whether the assessee can claim the benefit under the notification though the principal statue got amended singularly on the ground t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the due and the penalty because the final de-bonding order was rendered only on 10.07.2003? Apart from the aforesaid questions, Mr. Radhakrishnan, learned senior counsel appearing for the Revenue submits that the fraud has been committed by the assessee and when there is fraud, everything stands vitiated. This aspect has been seriously contested by the learned senior counsel appearing for the a....