TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (12) TMI 961
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he Appellant. Shri k. C. Jena, ADC (AR) for the Respondent. ORDER Per Shri H.K. Thakur This appeal has been filed by the appellant against OIO No. 21/CUS/CC(P)/WB/2007 dt 20/8/2007 passed by CC (P) Kolkata, as Adjudicating authority, under which a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- has been imposed upon the appellant under Sec 117 of the Customs Act 1962. 2. Sh. R. N. Bandopadhyay (Consultant) appearing....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....od April 2002 to September 2002 was shown. That appellant desired to check it up and promised to comeback within seven days but did not turn up thereafter. Learned AR further submitted that goods have actually not been exported to Bangladesh & huge amounts have been taken by the appellant and his company as Drawback. That only argument given in reply to show cause notice by the appellant is that n....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....4 of the OIO dt 28/8/2007 appellant was summoned to explain the quantity of 8,48,000 Pcs declared in two shipping bill as against 3,29,000 Pcs of bill pen procured. Appellant proposed to check up and comeback within one week but did not turn up Appellant was thus not co-operative during the investigation. Appellant also did not say that another Director was looking after the Customs related work. ....