2016 (12) TMI 774
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er For the Appellant Shri S. Murugappan, Adv. For the Respondent Shri B. Balamurugan, AC (AR) ORDER The adjudication order shows from para 33 thereof that the authority has examined thoroughly the incriminating evidences gathered in the course of search and implications thereof evaluated. He has gone into detail as to the modus operandi followed by the appellant to cause evasion of exc....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... of no corroborative evidence led by appellant to discard questionable modus operandi followed by it. Evaluation of evidences made by authorities below showed clandestine removal. Therefore both the appeals are liable to be dismissed. 4. Heard both sides and perused the record. 5. On perusal of the order of adjudication, it appears that learned adjudicating authority has rigourou....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ing that to 25% of the duty element under section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 7. The evidences gathered from three persons corroborated the questionable modus operandi of the appellant company as has been recorded in para 60 of the order. That establishes that there was proper application of mind by the adjudicating authority demonstrating loss of Revenue. 8. Being sat....
TaxTMI