Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2012 (8) TMI 1060

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....peal by the Department against the order dated 21-09-2011 of the ld. CIT(A)-II, Jaipur for the assessment year 2008-09. 2.1 The only ground raised by the Department in this appeal is as under:- ''On the facts and in the circumstances of the ld. CIT(A) and in law the ld. CIT(A) has erred in:- (1) allowing depreciation and interest of Rs. 25,98,064/- from 8% net profit rate applied by the A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ption register, opening and closing stock inventory and the details in respect of labour charges amounting to Rs. 2,12,56,420/- and hardly maintained any vouchers, bills and evidences in respect of material expenses claimed at Rs. 4,08,15,573/-. According to the AO, the labour charges and material expenses constituted around 83.53% of the total expenses claimed by the assessee against contract wor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....its @ 8% on contract receipts by following the decision of ITAT Jaipur Bench in ITA No.849/JP/2009 dated 30-09-2011 for the assessment year 2007-08 in assessee's own case. 2.4 Now the Department is in appeal. 2.5 The ld. DR supported the order of the AO. 2.6 In his rival submissions, the ld. Counsel for the assessee strongly supported the impugned order passed by the ld. CIT(A) and st....