2012 (8) TMI 1060
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....peal by the Department against the order dated 21-09-2011 of the ld. CIT(A)-II, Jaipur for the assessment year 2008-09. 2.1 The only ground raised by the Department in this appeal is as under:- ''On the facts and in the circumstances of the ld. CIT(A) and in law the ld. CIT(A) has erred in:- (1) allowing depreciation and interest of Rs. 25,98,064/- from 8% net profit rate applied by the A....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ption register, opening and closing stock inventory and the details in respect of labour charges amounting to Rs. 2,12,56,420/- and hardly maintained any vouchers, bills and evidences in respect of material expenses claimed at Rs. 4,08,15,573/-. According to the AO, the labour charges and material expenses constituted around 83.53% of the total expenses claimed by the assessee against contract wor....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....its @ 8% on contract receipts by following the decision of ITAT Jaipur Bench in ITA No.849/JP/2009 dated 30-09-2011 for the assessment year 2007-08 in assessee's own case. 2.4 Now the Department is in appeal. 2.5 The ld. DR supported the order of the AO. 2.6 In his rival submissions, the ld. Counsel for the assessee strongly supported the impugned order passed by the ld. CIT(A) and st....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI