AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (12) TMI 426
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>Vineet Kothari, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Chander Kumar. Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. V. Sreenidhi, AGA ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy in hand is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Anantha Padmanabha Bhat Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and others in Writ Petition Nos.5435....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he stock which clearly refers to the goods dealt by the assessee in the regular day-to-day business for which he is registered by the Department. These Rules do not intend to cover the goods purchased for construction or being material to be fixed in the building premises of the assessee like the Vitrified Tiles in the present case. In the present case, the Tiles purchased from the State of Gujara....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....condition as specified under Rule 135(2) of the KVAT Rules, 2005 does not arise in the present case. 11. In the considered opinion of this Court, the respondent assessing authority has misused his power under Section 39(1) of the KVAT Act for reassessment of the assessee in the present case on the aforesaid ground. Therefore, notwithstanding the availability of the alternative remedy by w....