Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (8) TMI 1141

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: 1. With this appeal, the Assessee has challenged the correctness of the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-II, Surat dated 19.07.2013 pertaining to A.Y. 2008-09. 2. The sole grievance of the assessee is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in confirming the penalty of Rs. 39,715/- levied by the A.O. u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. The assessee has preferred to present its case through....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hority, the A.O. initiated penal proceedings on the amount sustained by the ld. CIT(A) at Rs. 1,69,050/-. The assessee was asked to show cause why penalty should not be levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. Assessee strongly submitted that the additions have been sustained by invoking the legal fiction u/s. 50C of the Act and, therefore, it is neither a case of concealment of income nor furnishing of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars because the assessment has been completed by a legal fiction. 8. The Hon'ble High Court of Calcutta in the case of Madan Theatres Ltd. 260 CTR 75 has held:- "that the actual amount received was offered for taxation. It was only on the basis of the deemed consideration that the proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) started. The revenue had failed to pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s been made on the basis of deeming provisions of section 50C. The assessee has furnished all the facts of sale, documents/ material before the AO. The AO has not doubted the genuineness of the documents/details furnished by the assessee. Only because the assessee agreed to the additions because of the deeming provisions it cannot be construed to be filing of inaccurate particulars on the part of ....