Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1980 (5) TMI 3

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Madras Versus Andhra Chamber of Commerce Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Versus South Indian Film Chamber of Commerce Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Versus South Indian Chamber of Commerce Judge(s)  : P. N. BHAGWATI., A. P. SEN., E. S. VENKATARAMAIAH. JUDGMENT This appeal by special leave is covered by the judgment of this court in CIT v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce [1965....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd the purpose of the activity carried on was to earn profit, that the object could be said to involve the carrying on of an activity for profit but if the predominant object was to subserve the charitable purpose then the inhibition of these last 9 words would not be attracted. It is clear from the facts set out in the judgment of the High Court that profit-making was not the predominant object o....