2016 (11) TMI 1137

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....non, Advocate for the Appellant. Shri. M.K. Mall, Asst. Comm. (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair 1. The appellant imported Colour TV sets. At the time of clearance there was a dispute regarding levy of CVD on the basis of MRP declared by the appellant. The lower authority decided that the imported goods are leviable to CVD @ 16% on the basis of MRP declared by the appella....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at the imported goods i.e. Colour TV sets were sold on the MRP based valuation, therefore, unjust enrichment is not applicable as the excess duty paid by the appellant does not influence the sale value of the goods. She further submit that as per the working of the MRP, the excess duty paid was not included in the costing therefore, the question of passing of the incidence of such duty does not ar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....35   Sales Tax 5,145   Dealer Scheme 5,190   Contribution 1,831   MRP 35,990   5. From the above data, it is not clear firstly the material cost shown as Rs. 23,535/-. No bifurcation of assessable value plus duty was given. Secondly no supporting of other elements such as freight, warranty spares, sales tax, dealer scheme, etc. was....