2016 (11) TMI 1127

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri P.S. Reddy, AR for the Respondent. [Order per: Sulekha Beevi, C.S.] 1. The issue involved in these three appeals being the same they were heard together and are disposed by this common order. 2. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of P and P medicaments falling under Chapter Heading No.3004 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They filed rebate claims for the duty paid by them on th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o grant the refund along with interest. The rebate claims were thus taken for process and in the abvoe three appeals, the appellants were paid the refund /rebate vide three separate orders passed vide Order-in-Original No. No.849/2012(27-12-2012), Order-in-Original NO.589/2012 (16-10-2012) and Order-in-Original No.299/2013(15-05-2013). Though the rebate was granted the original authority failed to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he department, the Ld. AR Sri P.S.Reddy reiterated the findings in the impugned order. He submitted that the rebate sanctioning authority had sanctioned the rebate vide impugned order within 3 months. In view of that, there being no delay in sanctioning the refund, the appellants are not eligible for any interest. The contention that the interest is payable from the date of original sanction of re....