2016 (11) TMI 902
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... (AR), for respondent Per: M.V. Ravindran This appeal is directed against order-in-original CAO No. 74/2004/CAC/CC/AH dated 30.7.2004. 2. When the matter was called out, none appeared on behalf of the appellant nor there is any request for adjournment. Since the appeal is of 2004, we take up the same for disposal in the absence of any representation from the appellant. 3. Heard the lea....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ppeal was preferred to CESTAT against the said order-in-original dated 8.6.2001, which was disposed of by way of remand as to rework out the landed cost as per the submissions of the appellant. The impugned order in this appeal is passed in de novo adjudication. 5. On perusal of the grounds of appeal taken by the appellant, we find that the appellant is not seriously contesting the valuation of....
TaxTMI