2016 (11) TMI 619

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Akil Kureshi, J. (Oral)]. - Petitioner No. 1 is a partnership firm. Petitioner No. 2 is partner. Petitioners have challenged an order dated 3-6-2015, by which Principal Commissioner of Customs, Kandla rejected application of the partnership for granting customs broker licence. The relevant portion of he order reads as under :- "2. In this conn....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Commissioner of Customs, Kandla. Case of the petitioners is that against such order, an appeal has been filed, which is pending before the CESTAT. In any case, the impugned order was passed without an opportunity of hearing being given to the petitioners. If such opportunity was granted, the petitioners could have pointed out to the authorities the correct facts. 3. From the record, it ....