Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (11) TMI 418

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent ORDER This appeal is directed against Order-in- Appeal No. PKS/517/BEL/2010  dtd. 15/2/2011  passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise(Appeals), Mumbai-III whereby  Order-in-Original No. R/1226 dated 16/6/2010 sanctioning the refund claim was set aside and appeal of the Revenue  was allowed. 2.  The fact of the case is that  the appellant was avail....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was not passed on to any other persons. Aggrieved by the said impugned order, appellant is before me. 3.  Shri. P.K. Shetty, Ld. Counsel for the appellant submits that  firstly Adjudicating authority has not given any findings  on the issue of unjust enrichment.  Secondly before the Commissioner(Appeals), appellant had produced C.A. Certificate  wherein it was  cat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....       5.  On careful consideration of submissions made by both sides, I find that  Original Adjudicating authority  has not gone into the issue of unjust enrichment.  Before the Commissioner(Appeals), appellant had produced  C.A. certificate  which certifies that incidence of duty  has not been passed on the customers or any othe....