2016 (11) TMI 412

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant Mr. Prakash Shah with Mr. Jas Sanghavi i/b M/s. PDS Legal for the respondent ORDER P. C. 1. After having heard Mr. Bangur at some length and perusing the order under challenge, we are of the view that the respondent/assessee accepted the order-in-original dated 7th November, 1997. The demand under that order was restricted to Rs. 72,84,929/-. Penalty was also imposed. 2. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....py of which is at Annexure 'B'. That having been denied, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals). That was dismissed on 26th July, 2005. However, when the assessee approached the tribunal, the tribunal allowed it on the basis of a view taken by the tribunal that on coming into force of section 11- BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the interest is payable on del....