Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (11) TMI 347

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....gi, Advocate, for the Appellant(s) Shri D.K. Deb, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for the Department ORDER Per Mr. Anil G. Shakkarwar : The brief facts of the case are that the appellant was supplying Bio-manure and Cane-seed meant for distribution amongst Cane Growers and Service tax paid on the transportation of Bio-manure and Cane-seed, transported to the Cane Growers was availed as Ce....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....redit and imposed equal penalty. Aggrieved by the said Order-in-Original dated 30-10-2013, appellant preferred appeal before Commissioner (Appeals), Lucknow. The ld. Commissioner (Appeals) through Order-in-Appeal No. 237-CEx/APPL-LKO/LKO/2014 dated 20-11-2014 agreed with the findings of the Original Authority and dismiss the appeal. 2. Aggrieved by the said Order-in-Appeal dated 20-11-2014, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e law in the case of "Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Hyderabad Vs. ITC Limited reported at 2013 (32) S.T.R. 288 (A.P.)" and argued that the plantation activity was held to be having nexus with the manufacturing activity of respondent in the said case law as ruled by Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. 4.  The ld. Department Representative has argued that there is ....