2013 (10) TMI 1422

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....an Rao, for the Petitioner. Shri Jalakam Sathyaram, SC, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : G. Rohini, J.]. - The petitioner is a registered company. It is pleaded that the petitioner is engaged in the manufacture of Slurry Explosives and Detonating Fuses falling under Chapter sub-heading Nos. 3602 00 10 and 3603 00 respectively of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3,80,000/-. 3. However, the petitioner made an application dated 28-12-2012 stating that there was a mistake on the part of the Department in calculating the tax liability of the petitioner, and in fact the same shall be ₹ 65,62,817/- only. 4. However, the petitioner's application was rejected by the respondent No. 3 by order dated 23-1-2013 stating that the respondent No. 3 is p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the petitioner, it appears from the counter affidavit that there was some confusion while calculating the value of the goods cleared on 30-4-2009 and 7-5-2009, particularly with regard to the quantum and value of the Detonating Fuse and Tunder Bolt. In fact, it is pleaded in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2 that the petitioner had not brought the said aspects i....