Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (2) TMI 941

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shri Makrand Joshi, Advocate for the Respondent ORDER This appeal is filed by revenue against the impugned order which set aside the Order-in-Original vide which rebate claim was rejected. 2.  This appeal is filed by the department before the amendment of the provisions of Finance Act wherein the appeal against the first appellate authority order in case of rebate claim, lies before....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  Tax is paid by the appellant and collected from the service recipient. 9.  The explanation of Rule 3 of the Export Service Rules, 2005 states as under" "for the purpose of this rule 'India' includes the designated areas in the continental shelf and Exclusive Economic Zone of India as declared by the Notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of External A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... used to providing such taxable service and the rebate shall be subject to such condition and limitation, if any, and fulfillment of such procedure, as may be specified in the notification." iii.  I find that export has taken place in terms of Rule 3 of Export of Service and as per the explanation SEZ would be excluded from the term 'India'.  The appellant would be eligible for ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in respect of the central excise duty paid. 6.  In our considered view, the findings recorded by the first appellate authority are correct and no interference is called, for as, there is no dispute that the services were rendered to various units in SEZ.  The Tribunal in the case of Sujana Metals Products Ltd. - 2011 (273) ELT 112 (Tri.-Bang.) has held that after coming into force of....