2008 (8) TMI 940
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Banerjee, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S.B. Shinde, JDR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Chittaranjan Satapathy, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides. 2. Shri Partha Banerjee, ld. Advocate appearing for the appellants states that the appellants produce non-alloy steel for which determination was done under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act and the appellants accordingly....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Ltd. v. C.C.E., Chandigarh - 2004 (169) E.L.T. 73 ( Tri.-Del.) (ii) Shree Venkatesh Steel Ltd. v. Commr. of C.E., Raigad - 2006 (199) E.L.T. 721 ( Tri.-Mumbai). He further states that in the case of the appellants, it has been clearly recorded in the stay order passed by the Tribunal that only 168 M.T. of stainless steel were cleared as against 2503 M.T. of non-alloy steel....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI