2016 (10) TMI 187
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Ashok K. Arya, Member (T)]. - Both sides have been heard in detail. The matter concerns with the benefit of Notifications No. 9/2003-S.T., dated 20-6-2003 and No. 24/2004-S.T., dated 10-9-2004. The appellant says that they have been conducting vocational trainings on 'international travel and tourism' under the guidance and authorization of International Ai....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....R. 161 (Del.)] and submits that it has upheld the CESTAT, Delhi decision for the same service in case of service provider, Ashu Export Promoters (P) Ltd. 2. Learned AR, Shri N. Jagdish appearing for the Revenue argues that the training course conducted by the appellant is not a recognized course under any Indian law. He argues that it is also not verified that all the candidates who underwe....