2010 (5) TMI 893

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....SDR ORDER M. V. Ravindran (Judicial Member) This stay petition is filed by the appellant for waiver of the pre-deposit of the amounts adjudicated by the adjudicating authority. 2. After hearing both sides for some time, we find that the appeal itself could be disposed at this juncture as the issue involved lies in a narrow compass. Hence, after allowing the stay petition, we take up th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mission that all the capital goods as well as the inputs which were procured by the appellants by availing the benefit of Notification No.13/81-Cus. dt. 9/2/1981, No.126/94 dt. 3/2/1994 and No.53/97-Cus. dt. 3/6/1997 were put to use. He would submit that the letter of the DGFT canceling the letter of permission suo moto clearly indicates that the appellant had done exports by putting the capital g....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Revenue when they imported the consignments of capital goods and inputs. 6. We have considered the submissions made at length by both sides and perused the records. It is seen from the records that the appellant had, on 2/1/2007 sought the permission of the Revenue authorities for destruction of obsolete capital goods which were imported for use by the appellants. There is no communication ....