Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (1) TMI 1306

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. This D.B. Excise Appeal under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, arising out of the order dated 12.04.2007 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short, 'the Tribunal'), by which it has set aside the order dated 24.01.2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeal-I), Jaipur. The Dep....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Excise Officers. They thereafter filed refund claim for MOT charges paid under protest during normal working hours from September 2001 to June 2003. The Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise Division, Kota rejected the refund claim filed by the respondent. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the rejection. 4. The Tribunal Relying upon Sigma Corporation (I) Ltd. vs. CCE [2004 (165) E.L.T. 168 (Tri-Del....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the customs area at any time.   6. In Sigma Corporation (I) Ltd. vs. CCE (supra), it was held that where the supervision of stuffing of goods in containers was rendered by the Officer within their range only i.e. within his normal place of working, the MOT charges are not payable. Similar view was taken in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Flair Filtration Pvt. Ltd. (supra). 7. The judgmen....