2016 (9) TMI 923
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Special Counsel for the Respondent ORDER P. C. 1. The petitioner has challenged by this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the orders passed by the respondent No.3 dated 3rd November, 2006, Annexure-A, 6th August, 2005 passed by respondent No.2, Annexure-I as also the order passed by respondent No.1 dated 20th March, 2002, Annexure-F. By the order dated 3rd November, 2006, th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....overy proceedings in abeyance for amount of Rs. 2,12,301/- for the period 9.12.98 to 31.1.99, till the decisions of Honourable Bombay High Court writ petition N.92 of 1999. Balance amount is recoverable as per provisions of Law." 2. On such a petition and during its pendency this Court after hearing both sides, passed an order on 15th October, 2010 which reads as under : " Heard the le....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ation by a reasoned order following principles of natural justice within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this Order. 5. It is made clear that pendency of this Petition shall not come in the way of deciding the said application. 6. S.O. after vacation." 3. The petitioners have, therefore, pursued their application dated 15th May, 2006, made to th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d on 22nd January, 2007. Upon the petitioner's application, an order was passed on 24th March, 2011, and the registration of the petitioner is validated from 1st April, 1998. Exhibit-1 to this additional affidavit tendered today by the Joint Commissioner is he requisite order of 24th March, 2011. 5. In view thereof, we do not think that the writ petition should be kept pending. The legal qu....
TaxTMI