TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (9) TMI 873
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tam and Mr.Mukul Gautam, Advs For the Respondents : Mr. Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD ORDER Ms. G. Rohini, Chief Justice (Oral) 1. "Taxation Bar Association", a registered association of Tax Legal Practitioners dealing with cases pertaining to Value Added Tax (VAT) in Delhi, filed this petition by way of Public Interest Litigation with the following prayers: "A. Directing the respondents and its s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the respondents." 2. We have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. 3. It may at the outset be noted that one of the members of the Petitioner association filed W.P.(C) No.4886/2016 as a PIL with the very same prayers and the same was dismissed by us by order dated 25.05.2016 observing as under: "2. Apparently, the petitioner seeks to raise....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mpugned action of the Respondents in withholding the refund to which the registered dealers are entitled to under the provisions of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (DVAT Act) is ex facie illegal apart from being in violation of the law laid down by this Court in W.P.(C) No.3817/2010 dated 03.06.2010 titled M/s Swarn Darshan Impex (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner, Dept. of Trade & Taxes and Anr., the P....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 38 of the DVAT Act and thus compelling the dealers to take recourse to the legal remedies for recovery of the amount to which they are entitled to. 6. To substantiate the plea that the refunds to various dealers are due for the tax period from 01.04.2011 to 31.03.2015, the information furnished by the Value Added Tax officers of Ward No.8, Ward No.10, Ward No.11, Ward No.13 and Ward No.14 under ....