2016 (9) TMI 845

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t : Shri G. P. Thomas, Authorised Representative ORDER Per Dr. D. M. Misra This is an appeal filed against order-in-appeal No. 101/2008(STC)/ID/Commr.(A)/Ahd. dated 25.09.2008 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Ahmedabad. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant during the relevant period registered with the department for providing taxable service under....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in turn, rejected their appeal. Hence, the present appeal. 3. Ld. Advocate for the appellant submits that the development of plots by construction of internal roads and other facilities, cannot be classifiable under construction of residential complex service. He submits that said issue has been settle by this Tribunal in the case of Alokik Township Corporation vs. Commissioner of Central Excise....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y is only of developing the land belonging to GHP for township, which comprises of levelling of the land, demarcation of plots/shops/business premises, construction of boundary wall surrounding the township, construction of roads as per the norms of JDA, erection of the iron poles with lamps, panels, MCBs etc. underground cabling work including laying of optical fiber cables, laying of constructio....