TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (9) TMI 699
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee is to be treated as primary agricultural society and is carrying on the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members and is entitled for deduction under Section 80 P (2) (a) (i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with respect to the interest received from Class B members who were involved in non-agricultural society? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the Class B members of the assessee society can be treated as the member of the Society for the purpose of Section 80 P (2) (a) (i) when Class B members do not have the right to participate in the voting and meetings of the board ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt has relied on the orders of the authorities. 6. Addressing the said issue, at paragraph No.8, in I.T.A.No.732/MDS/2014 dated 30/6/2014, the Tribunal has ordered as hereunder:- "The case of the assessee is that the income by way of interest and dividend earned by the assessee Society are from investments made in Salem District Central Co-operative Bank, which is also admittedly, a co-operative society and are allowable deduction. The Assessing Officer has held that the assessee has made only with Salem District Central Co-operative Bank and therefore, the income from investment with the Bank is not entitled for deduction under Section 80 P (2) (d) of the Act. On appeal, the Id.CIT (Appeals confirmed the order passed by the Id.CIT (Appe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... made with H.P.State Co-operative Bank in the shape of F.D.Rs. is income derived from banking business and therefore, eligible for deduction under Section 80 P (2) (a) (i) of the Income Tax Act" 8. After considering the decisions in CIT Vs. Karnataka State Co-operative Apex Bank reported in [2001] 251 ITR 194, CIT Vs. Ramanathapuram District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd reported in [2002] 255 ITR 423 (SC), a Division Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, at paragraph Nos.10 and 11 held thus:- "The Karnataka High Court in CIT Vs. Sri Ram Sahakari Bank Ltd., [2004] 266 ITR 632, held that the interest on investments and short-term fixed deposits in banks was entitled to be deducted under Section 80 P (2) (a) (i) of the Act. In fact, in....