TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (9) TMI 223
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er : Mr. S. Murugappan For the Respondent : Mr. V. Sundareswaran, Mr.T.M.Hariharan ORDER Heard Mr.S.Murugappan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned Senior Panel Counsel and Mr.T.M.Hariharan, learned Standing Counsel for the third respondent and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nterregnum, it appears that notices were sent by the second respondent on various dates with regard to the proposed action under section 28(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The notice states that the petitioner failed to produce the required documents for finalisation of the project import and was called upon to show cause as to why the amount of Rs. 1,10,00,000/- should not be recovered from them. Si....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....50,000/- and the goods having not been cleared within the statutory period, the Customs Authorities have brought the goods for sale and the sale was completed and taken delivery by the bidder on 25.10.2000 and 30.10.2000. This is evident from the communication given by the Warehouse Manager to the second respondent dated 07.01.2005. The said communication was in response to the letter written by t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Department cannot make a claim against the third respondent Bank and this observation would protect the interest of the third respondent Bank. 6. For the reasons assigned in the preceding paragraphs, this Court is inclined to issue appropriate directions to the second respondent to take note of the subsequent events, the fact that the goods in question were sold and the sale proceeds have been re....