2016 (9) TMI 182

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....C.A. for the appellant Sh. Yogesh Agarwal, DR for the Respondent ORDER Per Ashok K. Arya Both the parties, the appellant and the respondent (Revenue) have been heard. The appellant namely M/s Piramal Healthcare Limited is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of Commissioner Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax, Indore No. 22/Commr/Cex/IND/2014 dated 13.02.2014. Matter is co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot successful. (iii) The appellant is eligible for cenvat credit of service tax paid on the input services of technology development received from M/s Piramal Pharmaceuitical Development Services Pvt. Limited. (iv) Ld. Advocate relied on the following case laws: * M/s Cadila Healthcare Ltd. -2010 (17) STR 134 (Tri. Ahmd.) * Indswift Laboratories Ltd. -2015-TIOL-....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0,000/- on account of technology development service, which the appellant is claiming as input service. However, there is on record that the said amount of Rs. 6,61,80,000/- was returned back by the service provider to the appellant as unsecured loan. The Revenue has submitted that neither the subject input services were used in or in relation to the manufacture of final product as the project did....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....bove mention of third party namely MERCK makes the contents of this agreement little vague and dilute its authority. 5.2. Considering the facts of repayment by the service provider of service charges of Rs. 6,61,80,000/- as unsecured loan to the appellant; mention of a third party namely MERCK in the agreement; and the fact on record that this project of technology development for liquid filled....