Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (6) TMI 851

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssment years 2007-08 and 2008- 09 are filed by the assessee challenging the respective impugned orders of the Ld. CIT (A) dated 11.10.2011. The solitary issue in controversy in both the assessment years is the addition of Rs. 1,50,000/- made by the A.O. for alleged household expenses and sustained @30% of said by Ld. C.I.T.(A). 2. The facts which revealed from the record are as under. There was....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the search operation the assessee requested that the original return filed by him should be treated as return in response to the notice u/s.153A. The A.O. accepted the total return income of the assessee at Rs. 1,50,426/-. No undisclosed income was declared. The A.O. considered the withdrawal shown by the assessee and by making the observation that "looking the status and size of the family of t....