2016 (7) TMI 1145

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Narsimhan, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri R.K. Mishra, DR ORDER PER ARCHANA WADHWA: After hearing both the sides, we find that the appellants, who are engaged in the manufacture of Iron and Steel products, were selling their goods to independent wholesale buyers as also to their related persons. Revenue by entertaining a view that the sales made to the related persons are required....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d in the market by the appellants customers, he confirmed the demand. 3. Being aggrieved with the said order of the Original Adjudicating Authority, the appellant filed an appeal their against before the Commissioner (Appeals), challenging the confirmation of duty of Rs. 96,776/- and imposition of penalty of Rs. 20,000/-. The Commissioner (Appeals), instead of passing orders on the disputed is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the confirmation of demand of Rs. 96,000 approximately. It is an admitted fact that the part of the impugned order of the Original Adjudicating Authority dropping the demand was not challenged by the Revenue before the Commissioner (Appeals), in which case there was no occasion for the Appellate Authority to deal with or adjudge the correctness of that part of the order dropping the demand. It als....