Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (3) TMI 1100

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar, Sr. D.R. ORDER Anil Chaturvedi (Accountant Member) This appeal filed by assessee is against the order of CIT(A)-XVI, Ahmedabad, dated August 12, 2011 for the assessment year 2008-09 confirming penalty levied u/s.271(1)(b) of the Act. 2. The relevant facts as culled out from the materials on record are as under: 3. Assessee is an individual stated to be engaged in the business of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the order of A.O., assessee carried the matter before the ld. CIT(A) who vide order dated 12.08.2011 (in Appeal No. CIT(A) -XVI/ITO/Wd.-11(4)/208/10-11) dismissed the appeal of assessee. Aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(A), assessee is now in appeal before us and has raised following grounds: "1. That the CIT(A) has erred in holding that assessee did not have reasonable cause. 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ssions and perused the material on record. The issue in the present case is with respect to levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(b) of the Act on account of non-appearance of assessee in response to notices issued u/s.142(1) of the Act by the A.O. In the present case, we find that the assessment has been framed u/s.143(3) of the Act and further the income returned by the assessee has been accepted by A.O. w....