Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2016 (7) TMI 413

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri Ajay Saxena, A.R. For the Respondent ORDER The challenge in the present appeal is to a  penalty of Rs. 50,000/- imposed upon the applicant Shri C.K. Sunny in terms of the Provisions of Section 112(a)  of Customs Act 1962. 2.  For better appreciation of the reasons for imposing penalty upon the said applicant, we reproduce the  relevant paragraphs from the impugned order....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... at Rs. 5,00,000/- were done under a cloud with an intention of procuring the goods without payment of duty and maximizing his profits. 131.  In view of the above, Shri Sunny's contentions that he had purchased the CFLs from Shri Charley on the belief that duty has been paid on them does not hold merit. 132.  As per Section 112(a) of Customs Act 1962, any person, who in relation to t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o part and parcel of such illegal imports. 3.  Learned A.R. has drawn our attention to various paragraphs of the impugned order and on going through the same we find that, no doubt the appellant placed an order on Shri Charley for import of CFLs with markings  'Milton' which was  the shop's name of the appellant.  The said goods were actually imported  by Shri Charley and....